Morrison v. McCue
JOHN C. MORRISON, Jr. v. THOMAS W. McCUE
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court:
The motion of the plaintiff, which was denied by the Court below, was based upon the allegation that the findings as originally signed and filed had been subsequently and surreptitiously altered in a material respect. The truth or falsity of this allegation was matter so peculiarly within the knowledge of the Court itself, that its determination of the fact, in the one way or the other, would rarely, if ever, be disturbed here. There is nothing in the record before us which would enable us to say that the determination of the fact was incorrect in this instance.
Order affirmed.
Cited by
- People v. Ward Crim. No. 946. · 1904-01-16