Bush v. Taylor
WILLIAM BUSH v. CHARLES TAYLOR
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court:
In denying the motion for a new trial in this case, the Judge of the Court below very properly adverted to the fact that the statement by which the motion was supported was a mere skeleton statement, and that sundry papers purporting to have been put in evidence at the trial had been omitted, *113both from the files of the Court and from the engrossment of the statement. The transcript here is found to be in the same condition in this respect, and we cannot, upon such a statement, undertake to examine the questions which the appeal was intended to present.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Cited by
- Reclamation District No. 535 v. Hamilton Sac. No. 63 · 1896-05-13
- Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889) No. 11991 · 1889-07-17