Mayo v. Sprout
MAYO v. SPROUT
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court:
The authorities of the city were turned out of possession of the premises by means of a writ of habere facias issued in this action, to which they were not parties.
It is true they had entered only after the action of Mayo v. Sprout had been commenced, but it is clearly shown that, they did not go in under Sprout, or by collusion with him.
Under such circumstances it was an abuse of the process of the Court to disturb them, and the Court below properly directed that they be restored to the possession.
Order affirmed.
Cited by
- Pacific States Savings & Loan Co. v. Harwell Docket No. Sac. 4061. · 1928-06-14