Cross v. Zane
SAMUEL CROSS v. JOHN P. ZANE
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
By the Court:
The order, which is the subject of the appeal in this case, was not made upon affidavits alone, and it therefore does not *90fall within the exception in section three hundred and forty-three of the Practice Act. Under the provisions of the Practice Act and the rule upon the subject announced in JELaggin v. Clark, 28 Cal. 162, and uniformly adhered to since, we cannot disturb the order upon the record before us, and it is therefore affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Haggin v. Clark · 1865-04-15