Dyer v. Pixley
JAMES S. DYER v. FRANK M. PIXLEY
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
*157The judgment of the Court below was reversed from the bench, on the ground that the provisions of the Act of April 4th, 1870, did not apply to contracts entered into before the passage of that Act, and the Court below was directed to overrule the demurrer.
Cited by
- Davis v. Hearst L.A. No. 2509. · 1911-06-06
- Griswold v. Griswold L.A. No. 1266. · 1904-06-18
- Gonzales v. Cobliner No. 9359 · 1885-11-30