Foucault v. Pinet
VICTOR M. FOUCAULT v. JOHN PINET
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Niles (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Niles
By the Court, Niles, J.:
There is an error apparent upon the face of the report of the Commissioner. The plaintiff should have had judgment for one thousand two hundred and fifty-five dollars and sixty-five cents, with interest from its date at seven per cent per annum and costs.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to the Court below to modify its judgment in accordance with this opinion. Remittitur forthwith.
Cited by
- Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co. S. F. No. 683 · 1898-10-04