Gannon v. Dougherty
JAMES GANNON v. GEORGE DOUGHERTY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- William T. Wallace (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Wallace
By the Court, Wallace, J.:
The demurrer was properly sustained; it did not appear that the counterclaims relied upon existed in favor of the defendants at the time of the commencement of the action.
There is nothing in the other points; the appeal is without merit, and the judgment is affirmed, with ten per cent damages.
Mr. Justice Crockett did not participate in the foregoing decision.
Cited by
- Wood v. Brush No. 9515 · 1887-04-20