gno.law

Anderson v. Fisk

California Supreme Court · No. 2,819 · 1871-07-01 · Published · 41 Cal. 308

HARRIET ANDERSON, ARTHUR B. ROSS, of D. L. ROSS, JOHN D. HOLLINGSWORTH, and HEZEKIAH S. HOLLINGSWORTH, JOSEPH B. HOLLINGSWORTH, SARAH E. DUNCAN, and WILLIAM T. HOLLINGSWORTH, Minors, by their Guardian ad litem, J. D. HOLLINGSWORTH v. JOHN FISK, S. C. HASTINGS, WM. J. DOBBINS, MASON WILSON, WM. B. DAVIS, Administrator of Wils. Davis, E. F. GILLESPIE, P. ABRAHAMSON, W. J. GLENN, BASCOM JEWETT, MARION JANES, JACOB BLUM, M. BLUM, JOHN BLUM, and E. LONG

Area
civil
Panel
Richard W. Rhodes (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Rhodes

By the Court, Rhodes, C. J.:

The Court erred in admitting in evidence the record of the Prohate Court in the estate of J. Caleb Smith, deceased. Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.

Reither Mr. Justice Crockett nor Mr. Justice Temple participated in the foregoing decision.