People v. Bangeneaur
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. JOHN BANGENEAUR
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Jackson Temple (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Temple
Temple, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, Rhodes, C. J., 'Wallace, J., and Crockett, J., concurring:
The defendant was convicted of the crime of burglary. At the time he was called up for sentence, for some reason *614which, does not appear, the District Attorney asked that the verdict be set aside and a new trial granted. The motion was sustained against the objection of the defendant, who, feeling aggrieved, has appealed to this Court from the order.
The statute only authorizes the Court to grant a new trial upon application of the defendant.
The order is, therefore, erroneous and must be reversed. So ordered.
Cited by
- People v. Thompson Docket Nos. 18213, 36317 · 1970-07-31
- People v. Skoff Docket No. 1249. · 1933-04-14