People v. Burke
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. PETER BURKE
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Richard W. Rhodes (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Rhodes
By the Court, Rhodes, J.:
The indictment is sufficient. The offense is charged in the words of the statute defining the crime of which the defendant was accused. (People v. Martin, 32 Cal. 91; People v. English, 30 Cal. 216; People v. Garcia, 25 Cal. 531.)
The affidavit of the defendant does not show sufficient diligence on his part to entitle him to a continuance. (People v. Williams, 24 Cal. 31.)
Judgment affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Martin · 1867-07-01
- People v. Williams · 1864-07-01
- People v. Garcia · 1864-07-01
Cited by
- People v. Horvath Crim. No. 471. · 1913-11-20
- People v. Rangod Crim. No. 127 · 1896-05-21