Leffingwell v. Griffing
H. LEFFINGWELL v. FREDERICK GRIFFING
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Shafter (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Shafter
By the Court, Shafter, J.
This appeal is from an order overruling plaintiff’s objections to defendant’s motion for settlement of a statement on motion for new trial, and ordering said statement to be settled.
The order is not appealable. It was made in the course of proceedings taken with a view to a new trial, and is no more the subject of appeal than the order made in the course of the same proceedings fixing the 13th of February, 1865, as the day for settling the statement.
Further, there is no specification of grounds in the statement accompanying the appeal. The appeal is not based alone upon the affidavit contained in the record, but upon the affidavit aided, by a statement of facts aliunde, and is within the principle of Haggin v. Clark, 28 Cal. 162.
The appeal is dismissed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Haggin v. Clark · 1865-04-15
Cited by
- Magee v. Superior Court Civ. No. 534. · 1909-03-01
- Rousset v. Boyle No. 3546 · 1872-12-11