Hickinbotham v. Monroe
J. T. HICKINBOTHAM v. P. MONROE
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Sawyer (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Sawyer
By the Court, Sawyer, J.
The time for filing briefs having expired three months ago, and none having been filed, and there being no points on file,, as required by rule seventeen, the judgment is affirmed, on the authority of Edmondson v. Alameda County, 24 Cal, 349, and Hutton v. Reed, 25 Cal. 488. A like disposition will be made of all cases similarly situated, when taken up for decision in their proper order.
Cites, in this corpus
- Hutton v. Reed · 1864-07-01
Cited by
- Drexler v. Seal Rock Tobacco Co. No. 11022 · 1889-04-20
- Peek v. Peek No. 12315 · 1888-03-20
- Faris v. Lampson No. 11892 · 1887-08-16