Holm v. Roach
CATHARINE HOLM v. JAMES E. ROACH and P. W. ROACH
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Silas S. Sanderson (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Sanderson
By the Court, Sanderson, C. J.
On the 24th of February, 1864, this action was submitted on briefs, to be filed in ten days by appellants and ten days thereafter by respondent. On the 14th of April, upon the application of respondent, ten days further time was granted. That time has more than elapsed, and no briefs have been filed, and the transcript contains no assignment of errors. For these reasons we affirm the judgment of the Court below.
Judgment affirmed.
Cited by
- Faris v. Lampson No. 11892 · 1887-08-16