Sleeper v. Kelly
SLEEPER v. KELLY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Norton, Cope, Crocker
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Crockercopenorton
Crocker, J. delivered the opinion of the Court—Cope, C. J. and Norton, J. concurring.
This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit. The record shows that the nonsuit was granted on the motion of the plaintiff, and an appeal by him does not lie in such cases. (Imley v. Beard, 6 Cal. 666.)
The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Imley v. Beard · 1856-07-01
Cited by
- Simple Avo Paradise Ranch, LLC v. Southern Cal. Edison Co. B320948 · 2024-05-23
- Central Pacific Railroad v. Creed No. 11211 · 1886-08-27
- City & County San Francisco v. Certain Real Estate No. 3,216 · 1872-01-15
- Mecham v. McKay · 1869-07-01