Hestres v. Clements
HESTRES, Administrator v. CLEMENTS et a.l
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Cope (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Cope
Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court Norton, J. concurring.
The judgment in this case must be reversed for irregularity in the proceedings. When the judgment was entered there was a demurrer on file which had not been disposed of. Two of the defendants demurred separately, and the record shows that but one of the demurrers was acted upon. The other was filed after a default had been taken, but the attorneys for the plaintiffs accepted service of it, thereby waiving the default.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.
Cited by
- 338 South Avenue 16 v. Meyer CA2/5 B322757 · 2024-09-25
- Brown v. Pacific Telephone & Telelegraph Co. Civ. 56005 · 1980-05-06
- Oil Tool Exchange, Inc. v. Schuh Civ. 3275 · 1944-12-13
- Cuddahy v. Gragg Civ. No. 3166. · 1920-03-16
- Davidson v. Graham Civ. No. 1262. · 1914-09-21
- Sawtelle v. Muncy L. A. No. 196 · 1897-04-07
- Polack v. McGrath · 1867-07-01
- Calderwood v. Tevis · 1863-07-01