Mulholland v. Heyneman
MULHOLLAND v. HEYNEMAN
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Cope (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Cope
Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court Field, C. J. concurring.
This is an appeal from an order refusing to set aside a judgment on the ground of surprise. The application was addressed to the legal discretion of the Court; and upon the affidavits before us, we cannot undertake to say that this discretion has been improperly exercised. The recent case of Haight v. Green is decisive of the matter.
Order affirmed.
Cited by
- McGuire v. Drew No. 13402 · 1890-02-28
- Cox v. O'Neil No. 9285 · 1884-07-29
- Bailey v. Taaffe · 1866-07-01