People v. Hall
THE PEOPLE v. HALL
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Joseph G. Baldwin (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Baldwin
Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court Field, C. J. concurring.
This was a case for altering the brand of a horse with intent to steal it.
*426The indictment charges the property as that of an estate. This is insufficient. The charge should be of altering the brand of the animal as that of a particular individual, or that the owner of the animal was unknown.
For this error the judgment must be reversed and cause remanded.
Cited by
- People v. Prather Crim. No. 360 · 1898-05-18
- People v. Smith Crim. No. 86 · 1896-04-10