Tuolumne Redemption Co. v. Patterson
TUOLUMNE REDEMPTION COMPANY v. PATTERSON
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Cope (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Cope
,Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court Field, C. J. and Baldwin, J. concurring.
The plaintiff was entitled to a judgment upon the complaint; and the Court erred in requiring proof of the facts therein stated. The complaint" was verified, and the failure of the defendant to answer was an admission of the facts charged. No proof was necessary to enable the Court to render the proper judgment.
Judgment reversed and" cause remanded.