Cramer v. Supervisors of Sacramento
CRAMER v. SUPERVISORS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Cope (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Cope
Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court Field, C. J. concurring.
The appeal in this case is without merit. Under the sixty-seventh section of the Consolidation Act, the President of the Board of Supervisors has no power to draw the warrant which the plaintiff seeks to obtain, unless there is money in the treasury to pay it. The petition is silent upon that subject, and is therefore insufficient to entitle the plaintiffto the relief asked. There are other grounds of objection, but it is unnecessary to notice them.
Order dismissing the proceedings affirmed.
Cited by
- Tevis v. City & County of San Francisco S. F. 18624 · 1954-07-02
- Meyer v. City and County of San Francisco S.F. No. 3846. · 1907-01-03