McGinley v. Hardy
McGINLEY v. HARDY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Cope (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Cope
‘Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court.
Field, C. J. concurring.
We have examined the record in this case, and find no error for which the judgment should be reversed. The alterations in the plan of the building constitute a sufficient answer to any claim on the part of the defendant growing out of a failure to complete the contract within the time specified. The circumstances show very clearly a modification of the contract in' this respect.
Judgment affirmed.
Cited by
- Semas v. Bergmann Civ. 18626 · 1960-03-10