Crane v. Hirshfelder
CRANE v. HIRSHFELDERs.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Cope (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Cope
Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court Baldwin, J. concurring.
The demurrer in this case was improperly sustained. The judgment sought to be impeached is alleged to be without consideration, and a fraud upon the creditors of the judgment debtor. The complaint states all the facts necessary to maintain the action. It is charged that defendant Williams was a party to the fraud, and he is therefore properly united in the suit.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings.