Smith v. Fagan
SMITH v. FAGANs.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Joseph G. Baldwin (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Baldwin
Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court Cope, J. concurring.
The order granting a new trial is affirmed. The bill shows a title to relief upon the ground of the plaintiff’s interest, as a stockholder or partner in the joint stock company mentioned therein; entitling him, if the averments were proved, to a decree affirming his interest, and directing an account. The plaintiff was entitled to an account, and we can see no error in the order of the Court’ for a retrial upon the facts, even if we .are. to regard the *182statement as properly before us. If there be no statement, then there is no showing or presumption of error in the action of the Court.
Cited by
- Mitchell v. County Sanitation District Number One Civ. 22100 · 1957-04-22
- Hewel v. Hogin Civ. No. 77. · 1906-03-15