Heredink v. Holton
HEREDINK v. HOLTON
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Joseph G. Baldwin (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Baldwin
Baldwin, J.
Field, C. J. and Code, J. concurring.
On reargument, the facts are not found in the case, but only statements given of what witnesses testified as to several matters necessary to the correct determination of the issues involved. The Court below should find the facts—not merely state the proofs.
Judgment reversed and case remanded, that the Court may find the facts. Ordered accordingly.