Burdge v. Gold Hill & Bear Water Co.
BURDGE v. GOLD HILL AND BEAR RIVER WATER CO.
- Outcome
- affirmed — Lower v. Knox, (10 Cal. 480) affirmed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Stephen J. Field (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Field
Field, C. J. delivered the opinion of the Court Baldwin, J. and Cope, J. concurring.
The statement contained in the record was used on the motion for a new trial, and we can only examine the action of the Court below in denying the motion. The judgment cannot be reviewed except through the order made upon the motion, and from such order there is no appeal. (Lower v. Knox, 10 Cal. 480.) This leaves the case to stand upon the judgment roll, and as this discloses no error, the judgment must be affirmed.
So ordered.
Cites, in this corpus
- Lower v. Knox · 1858-07-01
Cited by
- Porter v. Brooks · 1868-07-01