Eldridge v. Wright
ELDRIDGE v. WRIGHTs.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Joseph G. Baldwin (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Baldwin
Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court Field, C. J. and Cope, J. concurring.
Application for injunction. We deny the application. We see no necessity for this application, if we had the power to grant it, for the remedy of the plaintiff under the order reviving the injunction pending the appeal is ample to protect the plaintiff until the appeal can be heard, or the injunction be dissolved by some competent authority.
Cited by
- City of Pasadena v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty. L.A. No. 2499. · 1910-06-06
- Swift v. Shepard · 1883-12-29