Treat v. Laforge
TREAT v. LAFORGEs.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Cope (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Cope
Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court Baldwin, J. and Field, C. J. concurring.
The judgment in this case must be construed by the verdict, which is confined to the plaintiff and the defendant, Laforge. We see no error in the record.
Judgment affirmed.
Cited by
- George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co. Civ. 16182 · 1948-02-05
- Prescott v. O'Connell Civ. No. 10535 · 1938-06-22
- Watson v. Lawson Sac. No. 1935. · 1913-09-30