Johnson v. Johnson
JOHNSON v. JOHNSON
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Cope (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Cope
Cope, J.
delivered the opinion of the Court—Baldwin, J. concurring.
This is a suit for a divorce. The defendant is charged in the complaint with adultery and with extreme cruelty. The evidence relates exclusively to the latter charge. We do not see how the decree of the Court below could have been different. The conduct of the plaintiff was well calculated to provoke the ill treatment of which she complains; and such treatment cannot, therefore, be urged by her as a ground for divorce. (See Bishop on Marriage and Divorce, Sec. 491.)
Judgment affirmed.
Cited by
- Schulze v. Schulze Civ. 6758 · 1962-08-01
- De Burgh v. De Burgh L. A. 21986 · 1952-11-25
- Farmer v. Farmer Civ. No. 3548 · 1947-05-07
- Popescu v. Popescu Civ. 11694 · 1941-07-15