Turner v. Melony
In Re TURNER v. MELONY, Controller
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Joseph G. Baldwin (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Baldwin
Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court— Terry, C. J. concurring.
The Bespondent having been inducted into office, and his commission showing him entitled to it from the first day of January last, as Judge of the District Court, is entitled to the salary annexed to the office from that time.
The question of his eligibility cannot be tried on mandamus.
Judgment affirmed.
Cited by
- Hallinan v. Mellon Civ. 20855 · 1963-07-16
- Klose v. Superior Court Civ. 14413 · 1950-04-11
- Elliott v. Van Delinder Docket No. 5077. · 1926-05-01
- Satterlee v. San Francisco · 1863-07-01