Clary v. Hoagland
CLARY v. HOAGLAND
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Terry
Terry, C. J. delivered the opinion of the Court Baldwin, J. concurring.
*175In this case, as the application for a certiorari shows upon its face that the party has an adequate legal remedy, by appeal, from any judgment which may be rendered in the County Court to his prejudice, the petition is denied.
Cited by
- Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Superior Court Civ. No. 1047. · 1913-09-24
- Olcese v. Justice's Court of the First Judicial Twp. S.F. No. 5194. · 1909-07-07
- Stuttmeister v. Superior Court No. 11527 · 1886-11-27