McCarty v. Christie
McCARTY v. CHRISTIE
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Terry
Terry, C. J. delivered the opinion of the Court Baldwin, J. concurring.
There is no error in the judgment. The insolvent proceedings constituted no bar to plaintiff’s claim, for the reason that defendants’ schedule contained no sufficient description of plaintiff’s demand.
The payment of Gallagher’s judgment operated to extinguish the prior lien, and the fact that the judgment debtor took a transfer of the certificate of sale and a Sheriff’s deed, instead of a certificate of redemption, could not operate to divest plaintiff’s lien.
Judgment affirmed.
Cited by
- Moore v. Hall Civ. 8307 · 1967-04-10