Magruder v. Melvin
MAGRUDER v. MELVIN
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Joseph G. Baldwin (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Baldwin
Baldwin, J., delivered the opinion of.the Court—Field, J., concurring.
This appeal is without merit. The appellant’s case is supported by neither law, justice, or fact. The appeal was evidently intended for delay, and the judgment is affirmed, with five per cent, damages.