Pinkham v. Wemple
PINKHAM v. WEMPLE
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Joseph G. Baldwin (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Baldwin
Baldwin, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, C. J., concurring.
The various questions made by the record have either been repeatedly settled by this Court, or are decided by reference to plain elementary principles. There is no single point taken, which, in our judgment, justified this appeal, and it would he a waste of time to notice the points in detail.
The judgment is affirmed, with five per cent, damages.
Cited by
- Vickter v. Pan Pacific Sales Corp. Civ. 18616 · 1952-01-09