Heihn v. Stansbury
HEIHN v. STANSBURY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Terry
Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Baldwin, J., concurring.
The appeal from the order denying a new trial was not taken within the time prescribed by law, and cannot be considered by the Court.
Upon the appeal from the judgment, no statement was filed until a year after judgment was rendered; therefore, we can only consider the judgment roll, which discloses no error.
Judgment affirmed.