People ex rel. Tallant v. Board of Supervisors
PEOPLE ex rel. TALLANT v. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Joseph G. Baldwin (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Baldwin
Baldwin, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Tebry, C. J., and Field, J., concurring.
The principles of this case have already been settled in the case of The People v. Bond, Assessor. This is a mandamus to compel the *301defendants to allow the Auditor to audit, and the Treasurer to pay, the sum of $197,000, the interest and Sinking Fund for the years 1857 and 1858, under the Act of May 1, 1851, entitled, “An Act to authorize the Funding of the Floating Debt of the City of San Francisco, and to provide for the payment of the same.”
The proceeding was discontinued on the hearing, as against the Auditor and Treasurer, and judgment for peremptory mandamus rendered against the defendants.
We have already held that the Board of Supervisors had no control over the Treasurer in respect to this matter. Their allowance or dis-allowance, auditing or refusing to audit, are alike immaterial: therefore, this proceeding against the defendants is improper. For this reason the judgment is reversed and the case dismissed.