Kirk v. Reynolds
KIRK v. REYNOLDS AND REYNOLDS v. HARRIS
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Terry
Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Baldwin, J., and Field, J., concurring.
This is a proceeding in the nature of a hill of review, the object of which is to procure an examination and reversal of the decree of the Court below in case of Raun v. Reynolds and Kirk, on the ground of error apparent in the record.
The plaintiff appealed from the decree in the-original case, and the - same questions raised by this record were presented in this Court on the appeal. As a party "cannot be permitted to prosecute two separate and distinct remedies in this Court for a review of the same question at the same time, the appeal is dismissed.