gno.law

Kewen v. Johnson

California Supreme Court · · 1858-07-01 · Published · 11 Cal. 260

KEWEN v. JOHNSON

Area
civil
Panel
Lawrence F. Terry (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Terry

Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court— Field, J., concurring.

There is no error in the judgment. By the record it appears that the greater part of the money in the hands of the defendant, under the attachment in the case of Goodwin v. Glazer, is claimed by a third party, who has instituted suit to recover it, which suit is now pending and undetermined. If this suit should be determined in favor of the claimant, the sum in the hands of the defendant will be sufficient to satisfy the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.