Cummings v. Chevrier
CUMMINGS v. CHEVRIER, (NO. 1.)
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Terry
Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court Baldwin, J., and Field, J., concurring.
The Court below erred in entering the order appealed from, upon the allegations and proofs before it.
In order to entitle a surviving husband or wife to the whole common property, it must be affirmatively shown that there are no descendants of the deceased. (§ 10 of Law concerning Husband and Wife, Wood’s Digest, 488.)
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.
Cummings v. Chevrier, (No. 2.)—Reversed and remanded, for the reason stated in the opinion in Cummings v. Chevrier, (No. 1.)
Terry, C. J.
We concur: Baldwin, J., Field, J.