Hurlburd v. Bogardus
HURLBURDs. v. BOGARDUS
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Terry
Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court Baldwin, J., concurring.
In this case, there was no such actual and continued change in the possession of the property, under plaintiffs’ purchase, as to take the case out of the operation of the Statute of Frauds. It remained in charge of the same person, at the same place, and was used in the same manner after as before such purchase.
Judgment affirmed.
Cited by
- Raddatz v. Hedgpeth Civ. 21047 · 1963-12-20
- Heinlen v. Beans No. 9121 · 1886-11-23