Chase v. Ries
CHASE v. RIESs
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Terry
Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court Baldwin, J., and Field, J., concurring.
This is an action on an appeaj-bond, executed by defendants, conditioned to pay the judgment appealed from, if the same should be affirmed by the Appellate Court.
it appears, from the record, that the judgment appealed from was reversed, with directions to the Court below to enter a dif*518ferent judgment, consequently no liability attached to defendants under the conditions of the bond.
Judgment affirmed.
Cited by
- Hood v. Verdugo Lumber Co. Docket No. L.A. 14363. · 1933-12-26