Miller v. Sanderson
MILLER v. SANDERSON
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Terry
Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court Field, J., and Baldwin, J., concurring.
The decree in this case is clearly erroneous. Admitting the allegations in the plaintiff’s bill to be true, it shows that he has a perfectly adequate remedy at law by an action on the official bond of the clerk. And he must pursue his legal remedy.
Judgment reversed, and bill dismissed.
Cited by
- People v. Coleman · 1854-01-15