Wilson v. Spring Hill Quartz-Mining Co.
WILSON v. SPRING HILL QUARTZ-MINING COMPANY, AND GRIFFITH v. SPRING HILL QUARTZ-MINING COMPANY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Joseph G. Baldwin (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Baldwin
Baldwin, J., delivered the opinion of the Court Terry, C. J., concurring.
These cases only differ from the case of Rowe v. The Table Mountain Water Company in this, that here the complaint is against a trading company, and the service of the summons is returned executed upon the company, by service upon one Pendleton, one of the partners and associates. The principle applicable to the two classes of cases is not materially different.
Judgment affirmed.
Cited by
- Eclipse Fuel Engineering Co. v. Superior Court Docket Nos. 16676, 16677, 16678, 16679, 16680 · 1957-02-27