Richards v. Schroder
RICHARDS v. SCHRODER
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Terry
Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court Field, J., and Baldwin, J., concurring.
The referee’s report shows conclusively that there was no delivery of the goods in question under the bill of sale from Boring to plaintiff. They continued in the possession of Webster, *435who was Boring’s bailee, and who was directed by Boring to pay to plaintiff the amount of his claim against Boring, out of money arising from sales of the property.
The facts reported bring the transaction fully within the fifteenth section of the Statute of Frauds, and a new trial was properly refused.
Judgment affirmed.