Walsh v. Harris
WALSHs. v. HARRISs.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Joseph G. Baldwin (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Baldwin
Baldwin, J., delivered the opinion of the Court Terry, C. J., concurring.
Suit in May, 1856; judgment in October, 1856.
The Court erred in refusing to admit testimony offered by plaintiffs to show that the water alleged in this suit is the same water for which a recovery was had in former cases between the present plaintiffs and the parties under whom the defendants claimed. There was no other means than by parol to establish this fact; and for this error the judgment is reversed, and cause remanded.
Cited by
- Guardianship of Case Civ. 13955 · 1943-03-29
- Pierce v. Whiting · 1883-06-16