Goodwin v. Glazer
GOODWIN v. GLAZER
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Terry
Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court Field, J., and Baldwin, J., concurring.
The mandamus in this case was improperly granted. Plaintiff had recovered a moneyed judgment, upon which the clerk of *334the Court refused to issue execution. For all damages resulting from this refusal, the plaintiff has, in ordinary course of law, a plain and adequate remedy, by an action on the bond of the officer, and it is well settled that the writ will not issue in such cases.
Judgment reversed.
Cited by
- Babcock v. Goodrich No. 4,089 · 1874-07-01
- Fulton v. Hanna No. 2,303 · 1870-10-15