Skillman v. Riley
SKILLMAN v. RILEY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Stephen J. Field (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Field
Field, J., delivered the opinion of the Court Terry, C. J., and Baldwin, J., concurring.
The papers embodied in the transcript, purporting to be a statement, are subject to the objection taken in Marlow v. Marsh, (9 Cal., 259.) The draft prepared by the appellant, and the *301amendments proposed by the respondent, and allowed by the Judge who tried the cause, are not incorporated into one document, and in their separate form do not constitute such a statement as we will notice on appeal. This was expressly decided in the case cited, and in People v. Edwards, (9 Cal., 291.) The judgment-roll is, therefore, the only record properly before us, and this does not disclose any error in the action of the Court below.
Judgment affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Marlow v. Marsh · 1858-07-01
Cited by
- Kling v. Gustason Docket No. 5530. · 1929-09-30
- Fritsch v. Stampfli Sac. No. 225 · 1897-07-01
- Oliver v. Blair No. 8809 · 1885-11-25
- Kimball v. Semple · 1867-07-01