gno.law

Tuolumne Cty. Water Co. v. Columbia & Stanislaus Water Co.

California Supreme Court · · 1858-07-01 · Published · 10 Cal. 193 · 1858 Cal. LEXIS 212

TUOLUMNE COUNTY WATER COMPANY v. COLUMBIA AND STANISLAUS WATER COMPANY

Area
civil
Panel
Albert G. Burnett (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Burnett

Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court Terry, C. J., concurring.

1. The complaint in this case is sufficient.

2. The witness Morrissey had no interest in the event of the suit, having ceased to be a stockholder before the suit was brought.

3. The damages were not excessive.

Judgment affirmed, with ten per cent, damages.