Mokelumne Hill Canal & Mining Co. v. Woodbury
MOKELUMNE HILL CANAL AND MINING COMPANY v. WOODBURY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Albert G. Burnett (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Burnett
Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court Terry, C. J., and Field, J., concurring.
This is an appeal from an order of the Court helow, dissolving an injunction. The record contains a mass of affidavits, and other matter, making a transcript of near one hundred pages. There is no brief, and no abstract of facts on file, and it is only-alleged, in general terms, that the Court erred in dissolving the injunction. We can not look through this large record for errors, when none have been stated by counsel.
The order of the District Court is, therefore, affirmed.