Meerholz v. Sessions
MEERHOLZ v. SESSIONS
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry, Albert G. Burnett, Stephen J. Field
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Fieldterryburnett
Field, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, C. J., and Burnett, J., concurring.
The statement embodied in the record was filed on the motion for a new trial, and we can only examine the action of the Court *278below in denying the motion. As the order was entered by consent, we cannot hear any objection to it on appeal.
Judgment affirmed, with twenty per cent, damages.
Cited by
- Fowler v. Fowler Civ. 20055 · 1954-07-13
- Gibson v. Berryman Civ. No. 762. · 1910-10-07
- Hibernia Savings Etc. Soc. v. Waymire S.F. No. 4878. · 1907-11-13
- Brotherton v. Hart · 1858-07-01