Wing v. Owen
WING v. OWEN
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry, Stephen J. Field
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Fieldterry
Field, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, C. J., concurring.
In this case no statement was filed setting forth the grounds upon which the defendants intended to rely on their motion for a new trial. The failure to file such statement operates as a waiver of the right to the motion. (Practice Act, sec. 195; Adams v. The City of Oakland, 8 Cal., 510.)
The order granting a new trial is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Cites, in this corpus
- Adams v. City of Oakland · 1857-07-01
Cited by
- Kerns v. Dean No. 8041 · 1885-04-28
- Corcoran v. Doll · 1867-07-01
- Hutton v. Reed · 1864-07-01