Scannell v. Strahle
SCANNELL v. STRAHLE
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry, Albert G. Burnett
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Terryburnett
Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., concurring.
The findings in this case, which are supported by the evidence, fully sustain the judgment; and wo have often held that we will not disturb the findings of a Court or jury on account of conflicting evidence.
The testimony offered by defendants, to prove ownership in the property, was properly rejected, because entirely inconsistent with the declarations and admissions of defendants, made at the time the plaintiff was induced to permit the property to remain in their possession until called for, Judgment affirmed.